Delft Dredging Engineering:

Delft University of Technology (Top-Left)

DHLLDV

©Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema

DSCRC

©Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema

Powered by

Our site is powered by Fullxml portal and content management system based on XML/XSL.

Delft University of Technology (Top-Right)

Website News

We noticed that many visitors like to view and/or download the many papers we show on this site. We will try to put more interesting publications on this website whenever we encounter it.

Calendar

Site map

Toolbar

	Home Resources Site map Traffic

General

	Home (16252 Hits) Whats new The Delft Head Loss & Limit Deposit Velocity Framework (DHLLDV) The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model (DSCRC) Dr.ir. Sape A. Miedema (22196 Hits) Introduction Short Curriculum Vitae Awards Bibliography Reports

Publications

	Lecture Notes Publications by subject

DSCRCM

	General Cutting of Sand, Clay & Rock (2486 Hits) The Cutting of Dry Sand (1460 Hits) The Important Specific Energy Graphs (906 Hits) Subpages: Specific Energy in Sand (2226 Hits) Specific Energy in Clay (1871 Hits) Specific Energy in Rock (1743 Hits) The Basic Soil Mechanics Equations (1573 Hits) The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model Book (16082 Hits) 01 The DSCRC Model Book Cover 02 Contents of the DSCRC Model Book. IOS Press: The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model

DHLLDV

	Slurry Transport: Fundamentals, A Historical Overview & The DHLLDV Framework. (20119 Hits) 03 Uniform Sands & Gravels 04 Graded Sands & Gravels 01 Description of the DHLLDV Framework. 02 The DHLLDV Framework Book Cover. 05 Contents of the Slurry Transport Book. Flow Regimes (1052 Hits) Subpages: Regime 1: Stationary or Fixed Bed, No Sheet Flow (2053 Hits) Regime 2: Stationary or Fixed Bed, Sheet Flow or Suspension (1612 Hits) Regime 3: Sliding Bed (Coarse) with Sheet Flow or Fixed Bed (Fine) with Suspension (1871 Hits) Regime 4: Sliding Bed (Coarse) with Sheet Flow or Fixed Bed (Fine) with Suspension (1913 Hits) Regime 5: Heterogeneous Transport (1630 Hits) Regime 6: Homogeneous Transport (1619 Hits) Regime 7: Sliding Flow (1494 Hits) Regime 8: Stationary or Sliding Bed, Cvt (1747 Hits) Regime 5-6: Pseudo Homogeneous Transport (1848 Hits) Scenarios (899 Hits) Subpages: Excess Hydraulic Gradient (2972 Hits) The Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 1: Fine Sands (3284 Hits) Scenario 1: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 1: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2A: Medium Sands (3136 Hits) Scenario 2A: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2A: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2B: Coarse Sands (3094 Hits) Scenario 2B: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2B: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 3: Gravels (3174 Hits) Scenario 3: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 3: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Standard Graphs (1023 Hits) Subpages: Dp=0.0254 m (1 inch) (19785 Hits) 11: Dp=0.0254 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.0254 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.0254 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.0254 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.0254 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.0254 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.0254 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.0254 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.0508 m (2 inch) (18060 Hits) 11: Dp=0.0508 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.0508 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.0508 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.0508 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.0508 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.0508 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.0508 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.0508 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.1016 m (4 inch) (17164 Hits) 11: Dp=0.1016 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.1016 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.1016 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.1016 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.1016 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.1016 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.1016 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.1016 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.1524 m (6 inch) (17834 Hits) 11: Dp=0.1524 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.1524 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.1524 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.1524 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.1524 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.1524 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.1524 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.1524 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.2032 m (8 inch) (17766 Hits) 11: Dp=0.2032 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.2032 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.2032 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.2032 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.2032 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.2032 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.2032 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.2032 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.2540 m (10 inch) (15380 Hits) 11: Dp=0.2540 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.2540 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.2540 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.2540 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.2540 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.2540 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.2540 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.2540 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.3000 m (about 12 inch) (16463 Hits) 11: Dp=0.3000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.3000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.3000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.3000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.3000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.3000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.3000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.3000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.4000 m (about 16 inch) (16961 Hits) 11: Dp=0.4000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.4000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.4000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.4000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.4000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.4000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.4000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.4000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.5000 m (about 20 inch) (16091 Hits) 11: Dp=0.5000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.5000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.5000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.5000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.5000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.5000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.5000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.5000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.6000 m (about 24 inch) (14995 Hits) 11: Dp=0.6000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.6000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.6000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.6000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 03: Dp=0.6000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.6000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.6000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 04: Dp=0.6000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions Dp=0.7000 m (about 28 inch) (12579 Hits) 11: Dp=0.7000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.7000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.7000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.7000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.7000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.7000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.7000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.7000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.7620 m (30 inch) (16160 Hits) 02: Dp=0.7620 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 03: Dp=0.7620 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 10: Dp=0.7620 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 05: Dp=0.7620 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 06: Dp=0.7620 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 01: Dp=0.7620 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 04: Dp=0.7620 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 11: Dp=0.7620 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV Dp=0.8000 m (about 32 inch) (12678 Hits) 11: Dp=0.8000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.8000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.8000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.8000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.8000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.8000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.8000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.8000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.9000 m (about 36 inch) (12689 Hits) 11: Dp=0.9000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.9000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.9000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.9000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.9000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.9000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.9000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.9000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=1.0000 m (about 40 inch) (12594 Hits) 11: Dp=1.0000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=1.0000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=1.0000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=1.0000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=1.0000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=1.0000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=1.0000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=1.0000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=1.1000 m (about 44 inch) (23717 Hits) 11: Dp=1.1000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=1.1000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=1.1000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=1.1000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=1.1000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=1.1000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=1.1000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=1.1000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=1.2000 m (about 48 inch) (14573 Hits) 11: Dp=1.2000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=1.2000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=1.2000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=1.2000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=1.2000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=1.2000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=1.2000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=1.2000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Summary with 6 pipe diameters (37731 Hits) 02 The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt, Uniform Sands & Gravels 01 The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs, Uniform Sands & Gravels 04 The Durand Froude number FL for the Limit Deposit Velocity, Uniform Sands & Gravels 05 The Bed Height & Slip Factor, Uniform Sands & Gravels 06B The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Graded Sands & Gravels, Cvt 08 Comparing 12 Models based on the transition heterogeneous-homogeneous 03 The Limit Deposit Velocity, Uniform Sands & Gravels 07 The Bed Height & Slip Factor, Graded Sands & Gravels 09 Comparing 22 Models based on the Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient 06A The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Graded Sands & Gravels, Cvs 10 Comparing Heterogeneous Models based on the Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Experimental Data (923 Hits) Subpages: 1978 Kazanskij (35905 Hits) 01 Kazanskij (1978) Comparing Models 02 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.103 m, d=0.38 mm 03 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.206 m, d=0.34 mm 04 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.410 m, d=0.27 mm 05 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.614 m, d=0.30 mm 06 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.800 m, d=0.30 mm 07 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.900 m, d=0.30 mm 08 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.26 mm 09 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.44 mm 10 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.83 mm 11 Karasik (1973) Sand ,Dp=0.307 m, d=0.20 mm 12 Kazanskij (1978) Sand ,Dp=0.450 m, d=0.426 mm 1955 Newitt et al. (36173 Hits) 02 Newitt et al. (1955) Heterogeneous 01 Newitt et al. (1955) Flow Regimes 03 Newitt et al. (1955) Sliding Bed 04 Newitt et al. (1955) Coal 05 Newitt et al. (1955) Gravel 06 Newitt et al. (1955) MnO2 07 Newitt et al. (1955) Sand B 08 Newitt et al. (1955) Sand C 10 Newitt et al. (1955) Gravel E 09 Newitt et al. (1955) Sand D 1952 Durand & Condolios (32807 Hits) 07 Durand & Condolios (1952) All Experiments 08 Durand & Condolios (1955) Limit Deposit Velocity 06 Durand & Condolios (1952) Diameters & Concentrations 01 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.0406 m, d=0.04 mm 02 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.44 mm 03 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=2.04 mm 04 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.44 mm 05 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=2.04 mm 1955 Worster & Denny (3650 Hits) 01 Worster & Denny (1955) 1967 Zandi & Govatos (3528 Hits) 01 Zandi & Govatos (1967) All Data 1960 Gibert (32850 Hits) 07 Gibert (1960) All Experiments 08 Gibert (1960) Particle Froude Number 09 Gibert (1960) Limit Deposit Velocity 01 Gibert (1960) Sands & Gravels 02 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.20 mm 03 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.37 mm 04 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.89 mm 05 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=2.04 mm 06 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=4.2 mm 1977 Turian & Yuan (3281 Hits) 01 Turian & Yuan (1977) correlations 1972 Yagi et al. (25637 Hits) 01 Yagi et al. (1972) Sand all 02 Yagi et al. (1972) Gravel all 03 Yagi et al. (1972) Limit Deposit Velocity 04 Yagi et al. (1972) Different Sands & Gravels 05 Yagi et al. (1972) Slip Ratio 06 Yagi et al. (1972) Coarse Sand, Dp=0.1552 m, d=0.91 mm. 07 Yagi et al. (1972) Gravel, Dp=0.0807 m, d=8.00 mm. 1906 Blatch (11492 Hits) 01 Blatch (1906) Two Sands 02 Blatch (1906) d=0.20 mm 03 Blatch (1906) d=0.55 mm 04 Blatch (1906) d=0.20 mm Copper Pipe 05 Blatch (1906) d=0.55 mm Copper Pipe 06 Blatch (1906) d=0.55 mm Steel Pipe 1970 Babcock (8421 Hits) 01 Babcock (1970) All Data 02 Babcock (1970) Concentrations 03 Babcock (1970) Figure 7 & 8 04 Babcock (1970) Figure 9 1937 OBrien & Folsom (4791 Hits) 01 OBrien & Folsom (1937) Homogeneous Transport d=0.17 mm 02 OBrien & Folsom (1937) Homogeneous Transport d=0.27 mm 1952 Soleil & Ballade (10743 Hits) 01 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.58 m, d=0.45 mm 02 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.58 m, d=0.55 mm 03 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.58 m, d=0.64 mm 04 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.70 m, d=0.45 mm 05 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.70 m, d=0.55 mm 06 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.70 m, d=0.64 mm 1961 Fuhrboter (19640 Hits) 02 Fuhrboter (1961) Dp=0.30 m, d=0.26 mm 03 Fuhrboter (1961) Dp=0.30 m, d=0.44 mm 04 Fuhrboter (1961) Dp=0.30 m, d=0.83 mm 01 Fuhrboter (1961) Sk & Skt 05 Fuhrboter (1961) LDV 1965 Thomas (3130 Hits) 01 Thomas (1965) Apparent Viscosity 1976 Thomas (49407 Hits) 01 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.19 mm 02 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.19 mm 03 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.19 mm 04 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.2085 m, d=0.19 mm 05 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.19 mm 06 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.19 mm 07 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.04 mm 08 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.04 mm 09 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.2085 m, d=0.04 mm 10 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.04 mm 11 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.04 mm 12 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.18 mm 13 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.18 mm 14 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.18 mm 15 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.18 mm 16 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.18 mm 17 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.48 mm 18 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.48 mm 1958 Silin et al. (31047 Hits) 06 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.614 m, d=0.29 mm 08 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.900 m, d=0.25 mm 07 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.800 m, d=0.33 mm 01 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.024 m, d=0.16 mm 02 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.024 m, d=0.34 mm 03 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.103 m, d=0.41 mm 04 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.206 m, d=0.34 mm 05 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.410 m, d=0.23 mm 1938 Howard (3281 Hits) 01 Howard (1938) 1939 Siegfried (3504 Hits) 01 Siegfried (1939) 1980 Kazanskij (4968 Hits) 01 Kazanskij (1980) Sand ,Dp=0.50 m, d=1.5 mm, Low Concentration 02 Kazanskij (1980) Sand ,Dp=0.50 m, d=1.5 mm, High Concentration 1987 Doron & Barnea (20907 Hits) 01 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.05 02 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.08 03 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.12 04 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.15 05 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.187 06 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal, LSDV & Minimum Hydraulic Gradient 1971 Kazanskij (3599 Hits) 01 Kazanskij (1971) Sand ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=0.2 mm 1967 Wiedenroth (11424 Hits) 01 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=2.2 mm, low concentration. 02 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=2.2 mm, high concentration. 03 Wiedenroth (1967) Gravel ,Dp=0.125 m, d=4.45 mm. 04 Wiedenroth (1967) Gravel ,Dp=0.125 m, d=5.95 mm. 05 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=0.2 mm. 06 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=0.9 mm. 1979 Boothroyde (8642 Hits) 01 Boothroyde (1979) Gravel ,Dp=0.20 m, d=4.3 mm. 02 Boothroyde (1979) Gravel ,Dp=0.20 m, d=10.0 mm. 03 Boothroyde (1979) Markham Fines ,Dp=0.20 m, d=0.20 mm. 04 Boothroyde (1979) Markham Fines ,Dp=0.20 m, d=0.20 mm, with Thomas (1965) viscosity. 1982 Clift (14055 Hits) 01 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Narrow Graded ,Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.68 mm. 02 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Narrow Graded ,Dp=0.44 m, d=0.68 mm. 03 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Broad Graded ,Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.68 mm. 04 Clift (1982) Sand, Dp=0.49 m, d=0.60 mm. 06 Clift (1982) Masonry Sand, Dp=0.44 m, d=0.42 mm. 05 Clift (1982) Masonry Sand, Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.42 mm. 07 Clift (1982) Foundry Sand, Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.29 mm. 08 Clift (1982) Foundry Sand, Dp=0.44 m, d=0.29 mm. 2014 Vlasak (3754 Hits) 01 Vlasak (2014) Gravel, Dp=0.10 m, d=11.0 mm. Publications Slurry Transport (938 Hits) Subpages: DHLLDV Publications (1895 Hits) Other Publications on Slurry Transport by S.A.Miedema (2907 Hits) Publications by other authors (2733 Hits) 2 Layer Model (29132 Hits) 01 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 02 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 03 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 04 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 05 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 06 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 07 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 08 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 09 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 10 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 11 Summary: The Normalised ExcessHydraulic Gradient, Cvt 12 The Wilson (1992) & Wilson (1997) Fit Functions Animations (1043 Hits) Subpages: Animations Large & Slow (2103 Hits) Animations Small & Fast (1936 Hits) 3 Layer Model + Download Excel Workbook (29530 Hits) 06 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 12 Comparing 2LM & 3LM 01 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 02 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 03 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 04 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 05 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 07 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 08 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 09 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 10 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 11 Summary: The Normalised ExcessHydraulic Gradient, Cvt

Calculators

	Scientific Calculator (2394 Hits) Converters (3083 Hits) Multi Converter The Moody Diagram for River Flow (1665 Hits) The Moody Diagram for Pipe Flow (1570 Hits) Terminal Settling Velocity (1564 Hits) Turbulence Settling Efficiency (1325 Hits)

Search site