
DHLLDV |  (2).jpg )
©Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema |
|
DSCRC |  (2).jpg)
©Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema |
|
Powered by | 
Our site is powered by Fullxml portal and content management system based on XML/XSL. |
|
Website News | |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Site map
|
|
Toolbar |
General |
Publications |
DSCRCM |
DHLLDV |
|
-
Standard Graphs (315 Hits)
-
Subpages:
- Dp=0.0254 m (1 inch) (4678 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.0254 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.0254 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.0254 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.0254 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=0.0254 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=0.0254 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.0254 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.0254 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=0.0508 m (2 inch) (3952 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.0508 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.0508 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.0508 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.0508 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=0.0508 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=0.0508 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.0508 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.0508 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=0.1016 m (4 inch) (4115 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.1016 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.1016 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.1016 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.1016 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=0.1016 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=0.1016 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.1016 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.1016 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=0.1524 m (6 inch) (4288 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.1524 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.1524 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.1524 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.1524 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=0.1524 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=0.1524 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.1524 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.1524 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=0.2032 m (8 inch) (3918 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.2032 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.2032 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.2032 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.2032 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=0.2032 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=0.2032 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.2032 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.2032 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=0.2540 m (10 inch) (3314 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.2540 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.2540 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.2540 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.2540 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=0.2540 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=0.2540 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.2540 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.2540 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=0.3000 m (about 12 inch) (3571 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.3000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.3000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.3000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.3000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=0.3000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=0.3000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.3000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.3000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=0.4000 m (about 16 inch) (3490 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.4000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.4000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.4000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.4000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=0.4000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=0.4000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.4000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.4000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=0.5000 m (about 20 inch) (3420 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.5000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.5000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.5000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.5000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=0.5000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=0.5000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.5000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.5000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=0.6000 m (about 24 inch) (3300 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.6000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.6000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.6000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.6000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 03: Dp=0.6000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.6000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.6000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 04: Dp=0.6000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- Dp=0.7000 m (about 28 inch) (2643 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.7000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.7000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.7000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.7000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=0.7000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=0.7000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.7000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.7000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=0.7620 m (30 inch) (5088 Hits)
- 02: Dp=0.7620 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 03: Dp=0.7620 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 10: Dp=0.7620 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 05: Dp=0.7620 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 06: Dp=0.7620 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 01: Dp=0.7620 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 04: Dp=0.7620 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 11: Dp=0.7620 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- Dp=0.8000 m (about 32 inch) (2753 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.8000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.8000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.8000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.8000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=0.8000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=0.8000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.8000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.8000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=0.9000 m (about 36 inch) (2984 Hits)
- 11: Dp=0.9000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=0.9000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=0.9000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=0.9000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=0.9000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=0.9000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=0.9000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=0.9000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=1.0000 m (about 40 inch) (3036 Hits)
- 11: Dp=1.0000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=1.0000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=1.0000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=1.0000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=1.0000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=1.0000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=1.0000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=1.0000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=1.1000 m (about 44 inch) (5889 Hits)
- 11: Dp=1.1000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=1.1000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=1.1000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=1.1000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=1.1000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=1.1000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=1.1000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=1.1000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Dp=1.2000 m (about 48 inch) (3302 Hits)
- 11: Dp=1.2000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV
- 10: Dp=1.2000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models
- 06: Dp=1.2000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes
- 05: Dp=1.2000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction
- 04: Dp=1.2000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions
- 03: Dp=1.2000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- 02: Dp=1.2000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters
- 01: Dp=1.2000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm
- Summary with 6 pipe diameters (19285 Hits)
- 02 The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt, Uniform Sands & Gravels
- 01 The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs, Uniform Sands & Gravels
- 04 The Durand Froude number FL for the Limit Deposit Velocity, Uniform Sands & Gravels
- 05 The Bed Height & Slip Factor, Uniform Sands & Gravels
- 06B The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Graded Sands & Gravels, Cvt
- 08 Comparing 12 Models based on the transition heterogeneous-homogeneous
- 03 The Limit Deposit Velocity, Uniform Sands & Gravels
- 07 The Bed Height & Slip Factor, Graded Sands & Gravels
- 09 Comparing 22 Models based on the Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient
- 06A The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Graded Sands & Gravels, Cvs
- 10 Comparing Heterogeneous Models based on the Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient
-
Experimental Data (325 Hits)
-
Subpages:
- 1978 Kazanskij (16549 Hits)
- 01 Kazanskij (1978) Comparing Models
- 02 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.103 m, d=0.38 mm
- 03 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.206 m, d=0.34 mm
- 04 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.410 m, d=0.27 mm
- 05 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.614 m, d=0.30 mm
- 06 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.800 m, d=0.30 mm
- 07 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.900 m, d=0.30 mm
- 08 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.26 mm
- 09 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.44 mm
- 10 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.83 mm
- 11 Karasik (1973) Sand ,Dp=0.307 m, d=0.20 mm
- 12 Kazanskij (1978) Sand ,Dp=0.450 m, d=0.426 mm
- 1955 Newitt et al. (18650 Hits)
- 1952 Durand & Condolios (17721 Hits)
- 1955 Worster & Denny (1310 Hits)
- 1967 Zandi & Govatos (1382 Hits)
- 1960 Gibert (17815 Hits)
- 1977 Turian & Yuan (1108 Hits)
- 1972 Yagi et al. (13920 Hits)
- 1906 Blatch (3499 Hits)
- 1970 Babcock (2588 Hits)
- 1937 OBrien & Folsom (1574 Hits)
- 1952 Soleil & Ballade (3405 Hits)
- 1961 Fuhrboter (13209 Hits)
- 1965 Thomas (1025 Hits)
- 1976 Thomas (21978 Hits)
- 01 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.19 mm
- 02 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.19 mm
- 03 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.19 mm
- 04 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.2085 m, d=0.19 mm
- 05 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.19 mm
- 06 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.19 mm
- 07 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.04 mm
- 08 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.04 mm
- 09 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.2085 m, d=0.04 mm
- 10 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.04 mm
- 11 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.04 mm
- 12 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.18 mm
- 13 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.18 mm
- 14 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.18 mm
- 15 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.18 mm
- 16 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.18 mm
- 17 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.48 mm
- 18 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.48 mm
- 1958 Silin et al. (17178 Hits)
- 06 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.614 m, d=0.29 mm
- 08 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.900 m, d=0.25 mm
- 07 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.800 m, d=0.33 mm
- 01 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.024 m, d=0.16 mm
- 02 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.024 m, d=0.34 mm
- 03 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.103 m, d=0.41 mm
- 04 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.206 m, d=0.34 mm
- 05 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.410 m, d=0.23 mm
- 1938 Howard (1095 Hits)
- 1939 Siegfried (1146 Hits)
- 1980 Kazanskij (1572 Hits)
- 1987 Doron & Barnea (13327 Hits)
- 01 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.05
- 02 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.08
- 03 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.12
- 04 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.15
- 05 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.187
- 06 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal, LSDV & Minimum Hydraulic Gradient
- 1971 Kazanskij (1197 Hits)
- 1967 Wiedenroth (3384 Hits)
- 01 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=2.2 mm, low concentration.
- 02 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=2.2 mm, high concentration.
- 03 Wiedenroth (1967) Gravel ,Dp=0.125 m, d=4.45 mm.
- 04 Wiedenroth (1967) Gravel ,Dp=0.125 m, d=5.95 mm.
- 05 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=0.2 mm.
- 06 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=0.9 mm.
- 1979 Boothroyde (2771 Hits)
- 1982 Clift (4385 Hits)
- 01 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Narrow Graded ,Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.68 mm.
- 02 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Narrow Graded ,Dp=0.44 m, d=0.68 mm.
- 03 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Broad Graded ,Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.68 mm.
- 04 Clift (1982) Sand, Dp=0.49 m, d=0.60 mm.
- 06 Clift (1982) Masonry Sand, Dp=0.44 m, d=0.42 mm.
- 05 Clift (1982) Masonry Sand, Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.42 mm.
- 07 Clift (1982) Foundry Sand, Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.29 mm.
- 08 Clift (1982) Foundry Sand, Dp=0.44 m, d=0.29 mm.
- 2014 Vlasak (1293 Hits)
|
|
 |
|
 |
Calculators |
|

|