Delft Dredging Engineering:

DHLLDV

©Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema

DSCRC

©Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema

Powered by

Our site is powered by Fullxml portal and content management system based on XML/XSL.

Website News

We noticed that many visitors like to view and/or download the many papers we show on this site. We will try to put more interesting publications on this website whenever we encounter it.

Calendar

Site map

Toolbar

	Home Resources Site map Traffic

General

	Home (15157 Hits) Whats new The Delft Head Loss & Limit Deposit Velocity Framework (DHLLDV) The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model (DSCRC) Dr.ir. Sape A. Miedema (21359 Hits) Introduction Short Curriculum Vitae Awards Bibliography Reports

Publications

	Lecture Notes Publications by subject

DSCRCM

	General Cutting of Sand, Clay & Rock (2355 Hits) The Cutting of Dry Sand (1393 Hits) The Important Specific Energy Graphs (843 Hits) Subpages: Specific Energy in Sand (2114 Hits) Specific Energy in Clay (1770 Hits) Specific Energy in Rock (1656 Hits) The Basic Soil Mechanics Equations (1473 Hits) The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model Book (15838 Hits) 01 The DSCRC Model Book Cover 02 Contents of the DSCRC Model Book. IOS Press: The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model

DHLLDV

	Slurry Transport: Fundamentals, A Historical Overview & The DHLLDV Framework. (19651 Hits) 03 Uniform Sands & Gravels 04 Graded Sands & Gravels 01 Description of the DHLLDV Framework. 02 The DHLLDV Framework Book Cover. 05 Contents of the Slurry Transport Book. Flow Regimes (1003 Hits) Subpages: Regime 1: Stationary or Fixed Bed, No Sheet Flow (1939 Hits) Regime 2: Stationary or Fixed Bed, Sheet Flow or Suspension (1529 Hits) Regime 3: Sliding Bed (Coarse) with Sheet Flow or Fixed Bed (Fine) with Suspension (1768 Hits) Regime 4: Sliding Bed (Coarse) with Sheet Flow or Fixed Bed (Fine) with Suspension (1786 Hits) Regime 5: Heterogeneous Transport (1543 Hits) Regime 6: Homogeneous Transport (1531 Hits) Regime 7: Sliding Flow (1422 Hits) Regime 8: Stationary or Sliding Bed, Cvt (1659 Hits) Regime 5-6: Pseudo Homogeneous Transport (1752 Hits) Scenarios (847 Hits) Subpages: Excess Hydraulic Gradient (2809 Hits) The Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 1: Fine Sands (3118 Hits) Scenario 1: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 1: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2A: Medium Sands (2969 Hits) Scenario 2A: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2A: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2B: Coarse Sands (2921 Hits) Scenario 2B: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2B: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 3: Gravels (3009 Hits) Scenario 3: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 3: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Standard Graphs (981 Hits) Subpages: Dp=0.0254 m (1 inch) (18546 Hits) 11: Dp=0.0254 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.0254 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.0254 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.0254 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.0254 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.0254 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.0254 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.0254 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.0508 m (2 inch) (16980 Hits) 11: Dp=0.0508 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.0508 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.0508 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.0508 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.0508 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.0508 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.0508 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.0508 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.1016 m (4 inch) (16276 Hits) 11: Dp=0.1016 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.1016 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.1016 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.1016 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.1016 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.1016 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.1016 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.1016 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.1524 m (6 inch) (16861 Hits) 11: Dp=0.1524 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.1524 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.1524 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.1524 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.1524 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.1524 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.1524 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.1524 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.2032 m (8 inch) (16807 Hits) 11: Dp=0.2032 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.2032 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.2032 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.2032 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.2032 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.2032 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.2032 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.2032 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.2540 m (10 inch) (14516 Hits) 11: Dp=0.2540 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.2540 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.2540 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.2540 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.2540 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.2540 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.2540 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.2540 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.3000 m (about 12 inch) (15436 Hits) 11: Dp=0.3000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.3000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.3000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.3000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.3000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.3000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.3000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.3000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.4000 m (about 16 inch) (15841 Hits) 11: Dp=0.4000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.4000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.4000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.4000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.4000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.4000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.4000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.4000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.5000 m (about 20 inch) (15150 Hits) 11: Dp=0.5000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.5000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.5000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.5000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.5000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.5000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.5000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.5000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.6000 m (about 24 inch) (14165 Hits) 11: Dp=0.6000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.6000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.6000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.6000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 03: Dp=0.6000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.6000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.6000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 04: Dp=0.6000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions Dp=0.7000 m (about 28 inch) (11864 Hits) 11: Dp=0.7000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.7000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.7000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.7000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.7000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.7000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.7000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.7000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.7620 m (30 inch) (15270 Hits) 02: Dp=0.7620 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 03: Dp=0.7620 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 10: Dp=0.7620 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 05: Dp=0.7620 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 06: Dp=0.7620 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 01: Dp=0.7620 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 04: Dp=0.7620 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 11: Dp=0.7620 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV Dp=0.8000 m (about 32 inch) (11962 Hits) 11: Dp=0.8000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.8000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.8000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.8000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.8000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.8000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.8000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.8000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.9000 m (about 36 inch) (11896 Hits) 11: Dp=0.9000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.9000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.9000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.9000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.9000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.9000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.9000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.9000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=1.0000 m (about 40 inch) (11846 Hits) 11: Dp=1.0000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=1.0000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=1.0000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=1.0000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=1.0000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=1.0000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=1.0000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=1.0000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=1.1000 m (about 44 inch) (22200 Hits) 11: Dp=1.1000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=1.1000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=1.1000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=1.1000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=1.1000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=1.1000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=1.1000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=1.1000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=1.2000 m (about 48 inch) (13662 Hits) 11: Dp=1.2000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=1.2000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=1.2000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=1.2000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=1.2000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=1.2000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=1.2000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=1.2000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Summary with 6 pipe diameters (36281 Hits) 02 The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt, Uniform Sands & Gravels 01 The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs, Uniform Sands & Gravels 04 The Durand Froude number FL for the Limit Deposit Velocity, Uniform Sands & Gravels 05 The Bed Height & Slip Factor, Uniform Sands & Gravels 06B The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Graded Sands & Gravels, Cvt 08 Comparing 12 Models based on the transition heterogeneous-homogeneous 03 The Limit Deposit Velocity, Uniform Sands & Gravels 07 The Bed Height & Slip Factor, Graded Sands & Gravels 09 Comparing 22 Models based on the Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient 06A The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Graded Sands & Gravels, Cvs 10 Comparing Heterogeneous Models based on the Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Experimental Data (883 Hits) Subpages: 1978 Kazanskij (34425 Hits) 01 Kazanskij (1978) Comparing Models 02 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.103 m, d=0.38 mm 03 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.206 m, d=0.34 mm 04 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.410 m, d=0.27 mm 05 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.614 m, d=0.30 mm 06 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.800 m, d=0.30 mm 07 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.900 m, d=0.30 mm 08 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.26 mm 09 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.44 mm 10 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.83 mm 11 Karasik (1973) Sand ,Dp=0.307 m, d=0.20 mm 12 Kazanskij (1978) Sand ,Dp=0.450 m, d=0.426 mm 1955 Newitt et al. (34819 Hits) 02 Newitt et al. (1955) Heterogeneous 01 Newitt et al. (1955) Flow Regimes 03 Newitt et al. (1955) Sliding Bed 04 Newitt et al. (1955) Coal 05 Newitt et al. (1955) Gravel 06 Newitt et al. (1955) MnO2 07 Newitt et al. (1955) Sand B 08 Newitt et al. (1955) Sand C 10 Newitt et al. (1955) Gravel E 09 Newitt et al. (1955) Sand D 1952 Durand & Condolios (31599 Hits) 07 Durand & Condolios (1952) All Experiments 08 Durand & Condolios (1955) Limit Deposit Velocity 06 Durand & Condolios (1952) Diameters & Concentrations 01 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.0406 m, d=0.04 mm 02 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.44 mm 03 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=2.04 mm 04 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.44 mm 05 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=2.04 mm 1955 Worster & Denny (3452 Hits) 01 Worster & Denny (1955) 1967 Zandi & Govatos (3353 Hits) 01 Zandi & Govatos (1967) All Data 1960 Gibert (31738 Hits) 07 Gibert (1960) All Experiments 08 Gibert (1960) Particle Froude Number 09 Gibert (1960) Limit Deposit Velocity 01 Gibert (1960) Sands & Gravels 02 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.20 mm 03 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.37 mm 04 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.89 mm 05 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=2.04 mm 06 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=4.2 mm 1977 Turian & Yuan (3067 Hits) 01 Turian & Yuan (1977) correlations 1972 Yagi et al. (24666 Hits) 01 Yagi et al. (1972) Sand all 02 Yagi et al. (1972) Gravel all 03 Yagi et al. (1972) Limit Deposit Velocity 04 Yagi et al. (1972) Different Sands & Gravels 05 Yagi et al. (1972) Slip Ratio 06 Yagi et al. (1972) Coarse Sand, Dp=0.1552 m, d=0.91 mm. 07 Yagi et al. (1972) Gravel, Dp=0.0807 m, d=8.00 mm. 1906 Blatch (10895 Hits) 01 Blatch (1906) Two Sands 02 Blatch (1906) d=0.20 mm 03 Blatch (1906) d=0.55 mm 04 Blatch (1906) d=0.20 mm Copper Pipe 05 Blatch (1906) d=0.55 mm Copper Pipe 06 Blatch (1906) d=0.55 mm Steel Pipe 1970 Babcock (7975 Hits) 01 Babcock (1970) All Data 02 Babcock (1970) Concentrations 03 Babcock (1970) Figure 7 & 8 04 Babcock (1970) Figure 9 1937 OBrien & Folsom (4528 Hits) 01 OBrien & Folsom (1937) Homogeneous Transport d=0.17 mm 02 OBrien & Folsom (1937) Homogeneous Transport d=0.27 mm 1952 Soleil & Ballade (10190 Hits) 01 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.58 m, d=0.45 mm 02 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.58 m, d=0.55 mm 03 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.58 m, d=0.64 mm 04 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.70 m, d=0.45 mm 05 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.70 m, d=0.55 mm 06 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.70 m, d=0.64 mm 1961 Fuhrboter (19081 Hits) 02 Fuhrboter (1961) Dp=0.30 m, d=0.26 mm 03 Fuhrboter (1961) Dp=0.30 m, d=0.44 mm 04 Fuhrboter (1961) Dp=0.30 m, d=0.83 mm 01 Fuhrboter (1961) Sk & Skt 05 Fuhrboter (1961) LDV 1965 Thomas (2946 Hits) 01 Thomas (1965) Apparent Viscosity 1976 Thomas (47277 Hits) 01 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.19 mm 02 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.19 mm 03 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.19 mm 04 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.2085 m, d=0.19 mm 05 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.19 mm 06 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.19 mm 07 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.04 mm 08 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.04 mm 09 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.2085 m, d=0.04 mm 10 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.04 mm 11 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.04 mm 12 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.18 mm 13 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.18 mm 14 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.18 mm 15 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.18 mm 16 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.18 mm 17 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.48 mm 18 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.48 mm 1958 Silin et al. (30017 Hits) 06 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.614 m, d=0.29 mm 08 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.900 m, d=0.25 mm 07 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.800 m, d=0.33 mm 01 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.024 m, d=0.16 mm 02 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.024 m, d=0.34 mm 03 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.103 m, d=0.41 mm 04 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.206 m, d=0.34 mm 05 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.410 m, d=0.23 mm 1938 Howard (3091 Hits) 01 Howard (1938) 1939 Siegfried (3302 Hits) 01 Siegfried (1939) 1980 Kazanskij (4710 Hits) 01 Kazanskij (1980) Sand ,Dp=0.50 m, d=1.5 mm, Low Concentration 02 Kazanskij (1980) Sand ,Dp=0.50 m, d=1.5 mm, High Concentration 1987 Doron & Barnea (20328 Hits) 01 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.05 02 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.08 03 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.12 04 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.15 05 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.187 06 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal, LSDV & Minimum Hydraulic Gradient 1971 Kazanskij (3407 Hits) 01 Kazanskij (1971) Sand ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=0.2 mm 1967 Wiedenroth (10831 Hits) 01 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=2.2 mm, low concentration. 02 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=2.2 mm, high concentration. 03 Wiedenroth (1967) Gravel ,Dp=0.125 m, d=4.45 mm. 04 Wiedenroth (1967) Gravel ,Dp=0.125 m, d=5.95 mm. 05 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=0.2 mm. 06 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=0.9 mm. 1979 Boothroyde (8179 Hits) 01 Boothroyde (1979) Gravel ,Dp=0.20 m, d=4.3 mm. 02 Boothroyde (1979) Gravel ,Dp=0.20 m, d=10.0 mm. 03 Boothroyde (1979) Markham Fines ,Dp=0.20 m, d=0.20 mm. 04 Boothroyde (1979) Markham Fines ,Dp=0.20 m, d=0.20 mm, with Thomas (1965) viscosity. 1982 Clift (13315 Hits) 01 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Narrow Graded ,Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.68 mm. 02 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Narrow Graded ,Dp=0.44 m, d=0.68 mm. 03 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Broad Graded ,Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.68 mm. 04 Clift (1982) Sand, Dp=0.49 m, d=0.60 mm. 06 Clift (1982) Masonry Sand, Dp=0.44 m, d=0.42 mm. 05 Clift (1982) Masonry Sand, Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.42 mm. 07 Clift (1982) Foundry Sand, Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.29 mm. 08 Clift (1982) Foundry Sand, Dp=0.44 m, d=0.29 mm. 2014 Vlasak (3554 Hits) 01 Vlasak (2014) Gravel, Dp=0.10 m, d=11.0 mm. Publications Slurry Transport (876 Hits) Subpages: DHLLDV Publications (1769 Hits) Other Publications on Slurry Transport by S.A.Miedema (2755 Hits) Publications by other authors (2548 Hits) 2 Layer Model (28157 Hits) 01 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 02 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 03 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 04 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 05 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 06 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 07 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 08 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 09 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 10 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 11 Summary: The Normalised ExcessHydraulic Gradient, Cvt 12 The Wilson (1992) & Wilson (1997) Fit Functions Animations (1000 Hits) Subpages: Animations Large & Slow (1990 Hits) Animations Small & Fast (1819 Hits) 3 Layer Model + Download Excel Workbook (28503 Hits) 06 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 12 Comparing 2LM & 3LM 01 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 02 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 03 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 04 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 05 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 07 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 08 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 09 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 10 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 11 Summary: The Normalised ExcessHydraulic Gradient, Cvt

Calculators

	Scientific Calculator (2262 Hits) Converters (2893 Hits) Multi Converter The Moody Diagram for River Flow (1584 Hits) The Moody Diagram for Pipe Flow (1496 Hits) Terminal Settling Velocity (1483 Hits) Turbulence Settling Efficiency (1260 Hits)

Search site