Delft Dredging Engineering:

Powered by Fullxml

DHLLDV

©Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema

DSCRC

©Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema

Powered by

Our site is powered by Fullxml portal and content management system based on XML/XSL.

Website News

We noticed that many visitors like to view and/or download the many papers we show on this site. We will try to put more interesting publications on this website whenever we encounter it.

Calendar

Site map

Toolbar

	Home Resources Site map Traffic

General

	Home (20336 Hits) Whats new The Delft Head Loss & Limit Deposit Velocity Framework (DHLLDV) The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model (DSCRC) Dr.ir. Sape A. Miedema (24764 Hits) Introduction Short Curriculum Vitae Awards Bibliography Reports

Publications

	Lecture Notes Publications by subject

DSCRCM

	General Cutting of Sand, Clay & Rock (2914 Hits) The Cutting of Dry Sand (1678 Hits) The Important Specific Energy Graphs (1079 Hits) Subpages: Specific Energy in Sand (2532 Hits) Specific Energy in Clay (2150 Hits) Specific Energy in Rock (2018 Hits) The Basic Soil Mechanics Equations (1941 Hits) The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model Book (16825 Hits) 01 The DSCRC Model Book Cover 02 Contents of the DSCRC Model Book. IOS Press: The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model

DHLLDV

	Slurry Transport: Fundamentals, A Historical Overview & The DHLLDV Framework. (21437 Hits) 03 Uniform Sands & Gravels 04 Graded Sands & Gravels 01 Description of the DHLLDV Framework. 02 The DHLLDV Framework Book Cover. 05 Contents of the Slurry Transport Book. Flow Regimes (1234 Hits) Subpages: Regime 1: Stationary or Fixed Bed, No Sheet Flow (2382 Hits) Regime 2: Stationary or Fixed Bed, Sheet Flow or Suspension (1877 Hits) Regime 3: Sliding Bed (Coarse) with Sheet Flow or Fixed Bed (Fine) with Suspension (2146 Hits) Regime 4: Sliding Bed (Coarse) with Sheet Flow or Fixed Bed (Fine) with Suspension (2214 Hits) Regime 5: Heterogeneous Transport (1885 Hits) Regime 6: Homogeneous Transport (1893 Hits) Regime 7: Sliding Flow (1743 Hits) Regime 8: Stationary or Sliding Bed, Cvt (1983 Hits) Regime 5-6: Pseudo Homogeneous Transport (2111 Hits) Scenarios (1065 Hits) Subpages: Excess Hydraulic Gradient (3498 Hits) The Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 1: Fine Sands (3822 Hits) Scenario 1: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 1: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2A: Medium Sands (3628 Hits) Scenario 2A: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2A: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2B: Coarse Sands (3627 Hits) Scenario 2B: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2B: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 3: Gravels (3658 Hits) Scenario 3: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 3: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Standard Graphs (1190 Hits) Subpages: Dp=0.0254 m (1 inch) (23871 Hits) 11: Dp=0.0254 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.0254 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.0254 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.0254 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.0254 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.0254 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.0254 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.0254 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.0508 m (2 inch) (21003 Hits) 11: Dp=0.0508 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.0508 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.0508 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.0508 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.0508 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.0508 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.0508 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.0508 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.1016 m (4 inch) (20046 Hits) 11: Dp=0.1016 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.1016 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.1016 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.1016 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.1016 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.1016 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.1016 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.1016 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.1524 m (6 inch) (20702 Hits) 11: Dp=0.1524 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.1524 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.1524 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.1524 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.1524 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.1524 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.1524 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.1524 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.2032 m (8 inch) (20576 Hits) 11: Dp=0.2032 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.2032 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.2032 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.2032 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.2032 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.2032 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.2032 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.2032 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.2540 m (10 inch) (17899 Hits) 11: Dp=0.2540 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.2540 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.2540 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.2540 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.2540 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.2540 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.2540 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.2540 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.3000 m (about 12 inch) (19648 Hits) 11: Dp=0.3000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.3000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.3000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.3000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.3000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.3000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.3000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.3000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.4000 m (about 16 inch) (20105 Hits) 11: Dp=0.4000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.4000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.4000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.4000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.4000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.4000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.4000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.4000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.5000 m (about 20 inch) (18719 Hits) 11: Dp=0.5000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.5000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.5000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.5000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.5000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.5000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.5000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.5000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.6000 m (about 24 inch) (17637 Hits) 11: Dp=0.6000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.6000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.6000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.6000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 03: Dp=0.6000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.6000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.6000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 04: Dp=0.6000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions Dp=0.7000 m (about 28 inch) (14831 Hits) 11: Dp=0.7000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.7000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.7000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.7000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.7000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.7000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.7000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.7000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.7620 m (30 inch) (18553 Hits) 02: Dp=0.7620 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 03: Dp=0.7620 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 10: Dp=0.7620 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 05: Dp=0.7620 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 06: Dp=0.7620 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 01: Dp=0.7620 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 04: Dp=0.7620 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 11: Dp=0.7620 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV Dp=0.8000 m (about 32 inch) (14860 Hits) 11: Dp=0.8000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.8000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.8000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.8000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.8000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.8000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.8000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.8000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.9000 m (about 36 inch) (14953 Hits) 11: Dp=0.9000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.9000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.9000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.9000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.9000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.9000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.9000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.9000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=1.0000 m (about 40 inch) (14677 Hits) 11: Dp=1.0000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=1.0000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=1.0000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=1.0000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=1.0000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=1.0000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=1.0000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=1.0000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=1.1000 m (about 44 inch) (27725 Hits) 11: Dp=1.1000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=1.1000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=1.1000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=1.1000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=1.1000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=1.1000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=1.1000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=1.1000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=1.2000 m (about 48 inch) (16932 Hits) 11: Dp=1.2000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=1.2000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=1.2000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=1.2000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=1.2000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=1.2000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=1.2000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=1.2000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Summary with 6 pipe diameters (42761 Hits) 02 The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt, Uniform Sands & Gravels 01 The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs, Uniform Sands & Gravels 04 The Durand Froude number FL for the Limit Deposit Velocity, Uniform Sands & Gravels 05 The Bed Height & Slip Factor, Uniform Sands & Gravels 06B The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Graded Sands & Gravels, Cvt 08 Comparing 12 Models based on the transition heterogeneous-homogeneous 03 The Limit Deposit Velocity, Uniform Sands & Gravels 07 The Bed Height & Slip Factor, Graded Sands & Gravels 09 Comparing 22 Models based on the Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient 06A The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Graded Sands & Gravels, Cvs 10 Comparing Heterogeneous Models based on the Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Experimental Data (1146 Hits) Subpages: 1978 Kazanskij (40489 Hits) 01 Kazanskij (1978) Comparing Models 02 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.103 m, d=0.38 mm 03 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.206 m, d=0.34 mm 04 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.410 m, d=0.27 mm 05 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.614 m, d=0.30 mm 06 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.800 m, d=0.30 mm 07 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.900 m, d=0.30 mm 08 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.26 mm 09 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.44 mm 10 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.83 mm 11 Karasik (1973) Sand ,Dp=0.307 m, d=0.20 mm 12 Kazanskij (1978) Sand ,Dp=0.450 m, d=0.426 mm 1955 Newitt et al. (39982 Hits) 02 Newitt et al. (1955) Heterogeneous 01 Newitt et al. (1955) Flow Regimes 03 Newitt et al. (1955) Sliding Bed 04 Newitt et al. (1955) Coal 05 Newitt et al. (1955) Gravel 06 Newitt et al. (1955) MnO2 07 Newitt et al. (1955) Sand B 08 Newitt et al. (1955) Sand C 10 Newitt et al. (1955) Gravel E 09 Newitt et al. (1955) Sand D 1952 Durand & Condolios (36243 Hits) 07 Durand & Condolios (1952) All Experiments 08 Durand & Condolios (1955) Limit Deposit Velocity 06 Durand & Condolios (1952) Diameters & Concentrations 01 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.0406 m, d=0.04 mm 02 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.44 mm 03 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=2.04 mm 04 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.44 mm 05 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=2.04 mm 1955 Worster & Denny (4205 Hits) 01 Worster & Denny (1955) 1967 Zandi & Govatos (4061 Hits) 01 Zandi & Govatos (1967) All Data 1960 Gibert (36361 Hits) 07 Gibert (1960) All Experiments 08 Gibert (1960) Particle Froude Number 09 Gibert (1960) Limit Deposit Velocity 01 Gibert (1960) Sands & Gravels 02 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.20 mm 03 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.37 mm 04 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.89 mm 05 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=2.04 mm 06 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=4.2 mm 1977 Turian & Yuan (3873 Hits) 01 Turian & Yuan (1977) correlations 1972 Yagi et al. (28468 Hits) 01 Yagi et al. (1972) Sand all 02 Yagi et al. (1972) Gravel all 03 Yagi et al. (1972) Limit Deposit Velocity 04 Yagi et al. (1972) Different Sands & Gravels 05 Yagi et al. (1972) Slip Ratio 06 Yagi et al. (1972) Coarse Sand, Dp=0.1552 m, d=0.91 mm. 07 Yagi et al. (1972) Gravel, Dp=0.0807 m, d=8.00 mm. 1906 Blatch (13306 Hits) 01 Blatch (1906) Two Sands 02 Blatch (1906) d=0.20 mm 03 Blatch (1906) d=0.55 mm 04 Blatch (1906) d=0.20 mm Copper Pipe 05 Blatch (1906) d=0.55 mm Copper Pipe 06 Blatch (1906) d=0.55 mm Steel Pipe 1970 Babcock (9749 Hits) 01 Babcock (1970) All Data 02 Babcock (1970) Concentrations 03 Babcock (1970) Figure 7 & 8 04 Babcock (1970) Figure 9 1937 OBrien & Folsom (5576 Hits) 01 OBrien & Folsom (1937) Homogeneous Transport d=0.17 mm 02 OBrien & Folsom (1937) Homogeneous Transport d=0.27 mm 1952 Soleil & Ballade (12615 Hits) 01 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.58 m, d=0.45 mm 02 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.58 m, d=0.55 mm 03 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.58 m, d=0.64 mm 04 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.70 m, d=0.45 mm 05 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.70 m, d=0.55 mm 06 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.70 m, d=0.64 mm 1961 Fuhrboter (21324 Hits) 02 Fuhrboter (1961) Dp=0.30 m, d=0.26 mm 03 Fuhrboter (1961) Dp=0.30 m, d=0.44 mm 04 Fuhrboter (1961) Dp=0.30 m, d=0.83 mm 01 Fuhrboter (1961) Sk & Skt 05 Fuhrboter (1961) LDV 1965 Thomas (3674 Hits) 01 Thomas (1965) Apparent Viscosity 1976 Thomas (55896 Hits) 01 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.19 mm 02 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.19 mm 03 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.19 mm 04 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.2085 m, d=0.19 mm 05 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.19 mm 06 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.19 mm 07 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.04 mm 08 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.04 mm 09 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.2085 m, d=0.04 mm 10 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.04 mm 11 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.04 mm 12 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.18 mm 13 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.18 mm 14 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.18 mm 15 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.18 mm 16 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.18 mm 17 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.48 mm 18 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.48 mm 1958 Silin et al. (34180 Hits) 06 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.614 m, d=0.29 mm 08 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.900 m, d=0.25 mm 07 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.800 m, d=0.33 mm 01 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.024 m, d=0.16 mm 02 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.024 m, d=0.34 mm 03 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.103 m, d=0.41 mm 04 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.206 m, d=0.34 mm 05 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.410 m, d=0.23 mm 1938 Howard (3788 Hits) 01 Howard (1938) 1939 Siegfried (4043 Hits) 01 Siegfried (1939) 1980 Kazanskij (5746 Hits) 01 Kazanskij (1980) Sand ,Dp=0.50 m, d=1.5 mm, Low Concentration 02 Kazanskij (1980) Sand ,Dp=0.50 m, d=1.5 mm, High Concentration 1987 Doron & Barnea (22745 Hits) 01 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.05 02 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.08 03 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.12 04 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.15 05 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.187 06 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal, LSDV & Minimum Hydraulic Gradient 1971 Kazanskij (4131 Hits) 01 Kazanskij (1971) Sand ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=0.2 mm 1967 Wiedenroth (13367 Hits) 01 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=2.2 mm, low concentration. 02 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=2.2 mm, high concentration. 03 Wiedenroth (1967) Gravel ,Dp=0.125 m, d=4.45 mm. 04 Wiedenroth (1967) Gravel ,Dp=0.125 m, d=5.95 mm. 05 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=0.2 mm. 06 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=0.9 mm. 1979 Boothroyde (9949 Hits) 01 Boothroyde (1979) Gravel ,Dp=0.20 m, d=4.3 mm. 02 Boothroyde (1979) Gravel ,Dp=0.20 m, d=10.0 mm. 03 Boothroyde (1979) Markham Fines ,Dp=0.20 m, d=0.20 mm. 04 Boothroyde (1979) Markham Fines ,Dp=0.20 m, d=0.20 mm, with Thomas (1965) viscosity. 1982 Clift (16526 Hits) 01 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Narrow Graded ,Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.68 mm. 02 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Narrow Graded ,Dp=0.44 m, d=0.68 mm. 03 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Broad Graded ,Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.68 mm. 04 Clift (1982) Sand, Dp=0.49 m, d=0.60 mm. 06 Clift (1982) Masonry Sand, Dp=0.44 m, d=0.42 mm. 05 Clift (1982) Masonry Sand, Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.42 mm. 07 Clift (1982) Foundry Sand, Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.29 mm. 08 Clift (1982) Foundry Sand, Dp=0.44 m, d=0.29 mm. 2014 Vlasak (4305 Hits) 01 Vlasak (2014) Gravel, Dp=0.10 m, d=11.0 mm. Publications Slurry Transport (1164 Hits) Subpages: DHLLDV Publications (2262 Hits) Other Publications on Slurry Transport by S.A.Miedema (3290 Hits) Publications by other authors (3722 Hits) 2 Layer Model (32189 Hits) 01 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 02 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 03 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 04 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 05 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 06 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 07 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 08 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 09 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 10 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 11 Summary: The Normalised ExcessHydraulic Gradient, Cvt 12 The Wilson (1992) & Wilson (1997) Fit Functions Animations (1184 Hits) Subpages: Animations Large & Slow (2348 Hits) Animations Small & Fast (2178 Hits) 3 Layer Model + Download Excel Workbook (32425 Hits) 06 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 12 Comparing 2LM & 3LM 01 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 02 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 03 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 04 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 05 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 07 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 08 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 09 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 10 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 11 Summary: The Normalised ExcessHydraulic Gradient, Cvt

Calculators

	Scientific Calculator (2771 Hits) Converters (3637 Hits) Multi Converter The Moody Diagram for River Flow (2208 Hits) The Moody Diagram for Pipe Flow (1806 Hits) Terminal Settling Velocity (1862 Hits) Turbulence Settling Efficiency (1571 Hits)

Search site