Delft Dredging Engineering:

DHLLDV

©Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema

DSCRC

©Dr.ir. S.A. Miedema

Powered by

Our site is powered by Fullxml portal and content management system based on XML/XSL.

Website News

We noticed that many visitors like to view and/or download the many papers we show on this site. We will try to put more interesting publications on this website whenever we encounter it.

Calendar

Site map

Toolbar

	Home Resources Site map Traffic

General

	Home (18721 Hits) Whats new The Delft Head Loss & Limit Deposit Velocity Framework (DHLLDV) The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model (DSCRC) Dr.ir. Sape A. Miedema (23607 Hits) Introduction Short Curriculum Vitae Awards Bibliography Reports

Publications

	Lecture Notes Publications by subject

DSCRCM

	General Cutting of Sand, Clay & Rock (2759 Hits) The Cutting of Dry Sand (1590 Hits) The Important Specific Energy Graphs (1013 Hits) Subpages: Specific Energy in Sand (2406 Hits) Specific Energy in Clay (2039 Hits) Specific Energy in Rock (1888 Hits) The Basic Soil Mechanics Equations (1768 Hits) The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model Book (16505 Hits) 01 The DSCRC Model Book Cover 02 Contents of the DSCRC Model Book. IOS Press: The Delft Sand, Clay & Rock Cutting Model

DHLLDV

	Slurry Transport: Fundamentals, A Historical Overview & The DHLLDV Framework. (20895 Hits) 03 Uniform Sands & Gravels 04 Graded Sands & Gravels 01 Description of the DHLLDV Framework. 02 The DHLLDV Framework Book Cover. 05 Contents of the Slurry Transport Book. Flow Regimes (1168 Hits) Subpages: Regime 1: Stationary or Fixed Bed, No Sheet Flow (2267 Hits) Regime 2: Stationary or Fixed Bed, Sheet Flow or Suspension (1783 Hits) Regime 3: Sliding Bed (Coarse) with Sheet Flow or Fixed Bed (Fine) with Suspension (2052 Hits) Regime 4: Sliding Bed (Coarse) with Sheet Flow or Fixed Bed (Fine) with Suspension (2118 Hits) Regime 5: Heterogeneous Transport (1785 Hits) Regime 6: Homogeneous Transport (1794 Hits) Regime 7: Sliding Flow (1643 Hits) Regime 8: Stationary or Sliding Bed, Cvt (1889 Hits) Regime 5-6: Pseudo Homogeneous Transport (2019 Hits) Scenarios (1009 Hits) Subpages: Excess Hydraulic Gradient (3332 Hits) The Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 1: Fine Sands (3612 Hits) Scenario 1: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 1: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2A: Medium Sands (3436 Hits) Scenario 2A: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2A: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2B: Coarse Sands (3407 Hits) Scenario 2B: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 2B: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 3: Gravels (3454 Hits) Scenario 3: The Hydraulic Gradient Scenario 3: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Standard Graphs (1122 Hits) Subpages: Dp=0.0254 m (1 inch) (21951 Hits) 11: Dp=0.0254 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.0254 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.0254 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.0254 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.0254 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.0254 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.0254 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.0254 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.0508 m (2 inch) (19952 Hits) 11: Dp=0.0508 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.0508 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.0508 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.0508 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.0508 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.0508 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.0508 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.0508 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.1016 m (4 inch) (18928 Hits) 11: Dp=0.1016 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.1016 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.1016 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.1016 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.1016 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.1016 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.1016 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.1016 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.1524 m (6 inch) (19601 Hits) 11: Dp=0.1524 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.1524 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.1524 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.1524 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.1524 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.1524 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.1524 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.1524 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.2032 m (8 inch) (19520 Hits) 11: Dp=0.2032 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.2032 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.2032 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.2032 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.2032 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.2032 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.2032 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.2032 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.2540 m (10 inch) (16921 Hits) 11: Dp=0.2540 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.2540 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.2540 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.2540 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.2540 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.2540 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.2540 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.2540 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.3000 m (about 12 inch) (18412 Hits) 11: Dp=0.3000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.3000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.3000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.3000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.3000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.3000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.3000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.3000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.4000 m (about 16 inch) (18892 Hits) 11: Dp=0.4000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.4000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.4000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.4000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.4000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.4000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.4000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.4000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.5000 m (about 20 inch) (17690 Hits) 11: Dp=0.5000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.5000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.5000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.5000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.5000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.5000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.5000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.5000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.6000 m (about 24 inch) (16639 Hits) 11: Dp=0.6000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.6000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.6000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.6000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 03: Dp=0.6000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.6000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.6000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 04: Dp=0.6000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions Dp=0.7000 m (about 28 inch) (14071 Hits) 11: Dp=0.7000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.7000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.7000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.7000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.7000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.7000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.7000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.7000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.7620 m (30 inch) (17638 Hits) 02: Dp=0.7620 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 03: Dp=0.7620 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 10: Dp=0.7620 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 05: Dp=0.7620 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 06: Dp=0.7620 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 01: Dp=0.7620 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 04: Dp=0.7620 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 11: Dp=0.7620 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV Dp=0.8000 m (about 32 inch) (14070 Hits) 11: Dp=0.8000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.8000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.8000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.8000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.8000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.8000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.8000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.8000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=0.9000 m (about 36 inch) (14135 Hits) 11: Dp=0.9000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=0.9000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=0.9000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=0.9000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=0.9000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=0.9000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=0.9000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=0.9000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=1.0000 m (about 40 inch) (13909 Hits) 11: Dp=1.0000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=1.0000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=1.0000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=1.0000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=1.0000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=1.0000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=1.0000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=1.0000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=1.1000 m (about 44 inch) (26144 Hits) 11: Dp=1.1000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=1.1000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=1.1000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=1.1000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=1.1000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=1.1000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=1.1000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=1.1000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Dp=1.2000 m (about 48 inch) (16014 Hits) 11: Dp=1.2000 m, Wasp, Wilson & SRC versus DHLLDV 10: Dp=1.2000 m, A Comparison Of Different Models 06: Dp=1.2000 m, The Transition Heterogeneous-Homogeneous Flow Regimes 05: Dp=1.2000 m, The Limit Deposit Velocity, Slip Factor & The Bed Fraction 04: Dp=1.2000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, 9 Fractions 03: Dp=1.2000 m, Graded Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm 02: Dp=1.2000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, 9 Particle Diameters 01: Dp=1.2000 m, Uniform Sands & Gravels, d=1 mm Summary with 6 pipe diameters (40363 Hits) 02 The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt, Uniform Sands & Gravels 01 The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs, Uniform Sands & Gravels 04 The Durand Froude number FL for the Limit Deposit Velocity, Uniform Sands & Gravels 05 The Bed Height & Slip Factor, Uniform Sands & Gravels 06B The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Graded Sands & Gravels, Cvt 08 Comparing 12 Models based on the transition heterogeneous-homogeneous 03 The Limit Deposit Velocity, Uniform Sands & Gravels 07 The Bed Height & Slip Factor, Graded Sands & Gravels 09 Comparing 22 Models based on the Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient 06A The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Graded Sands & Gravels, Cvs 10 Comparing Heterogeneous Models based on the Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient Experimental Data (1077 Hits) Subpages: 1978 Kazanskij (38671 Hits) 01 Kazanskij (1978) Comparing Models 02 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.103 m, d=0.38 mm 03 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.206 m, d=0.34 mm 04 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.410 m, d=0.27 mm 05 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.614 m, d=0.30 mm 06 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.800 m, d=0.30 mm 07 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.900 m, d=0.30 mm 08 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.26 mm 09 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.44 mm 10 Fuhrboter (1961) Sand ,Dp=0.300 m, d=0.83 mm 11 Karasik (1973) Sand ,Dp=0.307 m, d=0.20 mm 12 Kazanskij (1978) Sand ,Dp=0.450 m, d=0.426 mm 1955 Newitt et al. (38400 Hits) 02 Newitt et al. (1955) Heterogeneous 01 Newitt et al. (1955) Flow Regimes 03 Newitt et al. (1955) Sliding Bed 04 Newitt et al. (1955) Coal 05 Newitt et al. (1955) Gravel 06 Newitt et al. (1955) MnO2 07 Newitt et al. (1955) Sand B 08 Newitt et al. (1955) Sand C 10 Newitt et al. (1955) Gravel E 09 Newitt et al. (1955) Sand D 1952 Durand & Condolios (34850 Hits) 07 Durand & Condolios (1952) All Experiments 08 Durand & Condolios (1955) Limit Deposit Velocity 06 Durand & Condolios (1952) Diameters & Concentrations 01 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.0406 m, d=0.04 mm 02 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.44 mm 03 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=2.04 mm 04 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.44 mm 05 Durand & Condolios (1952) Dp=0.15 m, d=2.04 mm 1955 Worster & Denny (3998 Hits) 01 Worster & Denny (1955) 1967 Zandi & Govatos (3856 Hits) 01 Zandi & Govatos (1967) All Data 1960 Gibert (34963 Hits) 07 Gibert (1960) All Experiments 08 Gibert (1960) Particle Froude Number 09 Gibert (1960) Limit Deposit Velocity 01 Gibert (1960) Sands & Gravels 02 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.20 mm 03 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.37 mm 04 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=0.89 mm 05 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=2.04 mm 06 Gibert (1960) Dp=0.15 m, d=4.2 mm 1977 Turian & Yuan (3616 Hits) 01 Turian & Yuan (1977) correlations 1972 Yagi et al. (27318 Hits) 01 Yagi et al. (1972) Sand all 02 Yagi et al. (1972) Gravel all 03 Yagi et al. (1972) Limit Deposit Velocity 04 Yagi et al. (1972) Different Sands & Gravels 05 Yagi et al. (1972) Slip Ratio 06 Yagi et al. (1972) Coarse Sand, Dp=0.1552 m, d=0.91 mm. 07 Yagi et al. (1972) Gravel, Dp=0.0807 m, d=8.00 mm. 1906 Blatch (12579 Hits) 01 Blatch (1906) Two Sands 02 Blatch (1906) d=0.20 mm 03 Blatch (1906) d=0.55 mm 04 Blatch (1906) d=0.20 mm Copper Pipe 05 Blatch (1906) d=0.55 mm Copper Pipe 06 Blatch (1906) d=0.55 mm Steel Pipe 1970 Babcock (9215 Hits) 01 Babcock (1970) All Data 02 Babcock (1970) Concentrations 03 Babcock (1970) Figure 7 & 8 04 Babcock (1970) Figure 9 1937 OBrien & Folsom (5273 Hits) 01 OBrien & Folsom (1937) Homogeneous Transport d=0.17 mm 02 OBrien & Folsom (1937) Homogeneous Transport d=0.27 mm 1952 Soleil & Ballade (11889 Hits) 01 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.58 m, d=0.45 mm 02 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.58 m, d=0.55 mm 03 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.58 m, d=0.64 mm 04 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.70 m, d=0.45 mm 05 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.70 m, d=0.55 mm 06 Soleil & Ballade (1952) Dp=0.70 m, d=0.64 mm 1961 Fuhrboter (20677 Hits) 02 Fuhrboter (1961) Dp=0.30 m, d=0.26 mm 03 Fuhrboter (1961) Dp=0.30 m, d=0.44 mm 04 Fuhrboter (1961) Dp=0.30 m, d=0.83 mm 01 Fuhrboter (1961) Sk & Skt 05 Fuhrboter (1961) LDV 1965 Thomas (3474 Hits) 01 Thomas (1965) Apparent Viscosity 1976 Thomas (53336 Hits) 01 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.19 mm 02 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.19 mm 03 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.19 mm 04 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.2085 m, d=0.19 mm 05 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.19 mm 06 Thomas (1976) Coal ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.19 mm 07 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.04 mm 08 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.04 mm 09 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.2085 m, d=0.04 mm 10 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.04 mm 11 Thomas (1976) Iron Ore ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.04 mm 12 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.18 mm 13 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.18 mm 14 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1585 m, d=0.18 mm 15 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.2631 m, d=0.18 mm 16 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.3150 m, d=0.18 mm 17 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.0522 m, d=0.48 mm 18 Thomas (1976) Sand ,Dp=0.1075 m, d=0.48 mm 1958 Silin et al. (32907 Hits) 06 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.614 m, d=0.29 mm 08 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.900 m, d=0.25 mm 07 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.800 m, d=0.33 mm 01 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.024 m, d=0.16 mm 02 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.024 m, d=0.34 mm 03 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.103 m, d=0.41 mm 04 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.206 m, d=0.34 mm 05 Silin et al. (1958) Sand ,Dp=0.410 m, d=0.23 mm 1938 Howard (3585 Hits) 01 Howard (1938) 1939 Siegfried (3831 Hits) 01 Siegfried (1939) 1980 Kazanskij (5434 Hits) 01 Kazanskij (1980) Sand ,Dp=0.50 m, d=1.5 mm, Low Concentration 02 Kazanskij (1980) Sand ,Dp=0.50 m, d=1.5 mm, High Concentration 1987 Doron & Barnea (22020 Hits) 01 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.05 02 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.08 03 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.12 04 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.15 05 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=3.0 mm, Cvt=0.187 06 Doron & Barnea (1987) Acetal, LSDV & Minimum Hydraulic Gradient 1971 Kazanskij (3915 Hits) 01 Kazanskij (1971) Sand ,Dp=0.0508 m, d=0.2 mm 1967 Wiedenroth (12628 Hits) 01 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=2.2 mm, low concentration. 02 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=2.2 mm, high concentration. 03 Wiedenroth (1967) Gravel ,Dp=0.125 m, d=4.45 mm. 04 Wiedenroth (1967) Gravel ,Dp=0.125 m, d=5.95 mm. 05 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=0.2 mm. 06 Wiedenroth (1967) Sand ,Dp=0.125 m, d=0.9 mm. 1979 Boothroyde (9442 Hits) 01 Boothroyde (1979) Gravel ,Dp=0.20 m, d=4.3 mm. 02 Boothroyde (1979) Gravel ,Dp=0.20 m, d=10.0 mm. 03 Boothroyde (1979) Markham Fines ,Dp=0.20 m, d=0.20 mm. 04 Boothroyde (1979) Markham Fines ,Dp=0.20 m, d=0.20 mm, with Thomas (1965) viscosity. 1982 Clift (15548 Hits) 01 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Narrow Graded ,Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.68 mm. 02 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Narrow Graded ,Dp=0.44 m, d=0.68 mm. 03 Clift (1982) Crushed Granite Broad Graded ,Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.68 mm. 04 Clift (1982) Sand, Dp=0.49 m, d=0.60 mm. 06 Clift (1982) Masonry Sand, Dp=0.44 m, d=0.42 mm. 05 Clift (1982) Masonry Sand, Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.42 mm. 07 Clift (1982) Foundry Sand, Dp=0.2032 m, d=0.29 mm. 08 Clift (1982) Foundry Sand, Dp=0.44 m, d=0.29 mm. 2014 Vlasak (4083 Hits) 01 Vlasak (2014) Gravel, Dp=0.10 m, d=11.0 mm. Publications Slurry Transport (1082 Hits) Subpages: DHLLDV Publications (2120 Hits) Other Publications on Slurry Transport by S.A.Miedema (3160 Hits) Publications by other authors (3131 Hits) 2 Layer Model (30940 Hits) 01 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 02 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 03 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 04 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 05 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 06 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 07 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 08 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 09 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 10 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 11 Summary: The Normalised ExcessHydraulic Gradient, Cvt 12 The Wilson (1992) & Wilson (1997) Fit Functions Animations (1122 Hits) Subpages: Animations Large & Slow (2249 Hits) Animations Small & Fast (2086 Hits) 3 Layer Model + Download Excel Workbook (31331 Hits) 06 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 12 Comparing 2LM & 3LM 01 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 02 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 03 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Weight Approach with the Televantos (1979) Bed Shear Stress Approach 04 Wilson (1992) Hydrostatic Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 05 Miedema & Ramsdell (2014) Normal Stress Approach with the Miedema & Matousek (2014) Bed Shear Stress Approach 07 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 08 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvs 09 Summary: The Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 10 Summary: The Relative Excess Hydraulic Gradient, Cvt 11 Summary: The Normalised ExcessHydraulic Gradient, Cvt

Calculators

	Scientific Calculator (2639 Hits) Converters (3415 Hits) Multi Converter The Moody Diagram for River Flow (1834 Hits) The Moody Diagram for Pipe Flow (1724 Hits) Terminal Settling Velocity (1757 Hits) Turbulence Settling Efficiency (1470 Hits)

Search site